STRETCHING VERSUS CONCENTRIC EXERCISE FOR IMPROVING GLENOHUMERAL EXTERNAL ROTATION RANGE OF MOTION IN ASYMPTOMATIC SUBJECTS:A PILOT RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL

Authors

  • F Llarena-Quintanilla Departamento de Enfermería y Fisioterapia. Universidad de Alcalá. Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, España Author
  • R Fernández-Matías Instituto de Investigación Fisioterapia y Dolor. Universidad de Alcalá. Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, España , Unidad de Investigación. Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón. Alcorcón, Madrid, España Author
  • D Pecos-Martín Departamento de Enfermería y Fisioterapia. Universidad de Alcalá. Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, España, , Grupo de Investigación de Fisioterapia y Dolor. Universidad de Alcalá. Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, España Author

Keywords:

shoulder, external rotation, stretching, concentric exercise, suprascapular nerve.

Abstract

Background: previously published studies suggest that range of motion is highly influenced by a musculotendinous component mediated by neural mechanosensitivity. However, there is no published research that has com-pared passive stretching with an active exercise treatment focused on increasing neural tension on the improvement of glenohumeral range of motion. Aim: to evaluate if a concentric external rotation exercise is more effective than passive stretching for improving glenohumeral external rotation range of motion. Material and method: pilot randomized clinical trial. A convenience sample of 19 asymptomatic subjects between 18 and 30 years was recruited from University of Alcalá. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of each treatment (passive stretching or con-centric external rotation exercise) and received 4 sessions in alternating days within 2 weeks. The most shortened side was treated. Data regarding glenohumeral external rotation range of motion at 0 (RE1) and 90 degrees of abduction, and flexion were collected. 3-by-2 mixed-model analysis of variance (ANOVA) were conducted for out-come measures. Results: The mixed ANOVA only revealed a significant time-by-group interaction for RE1, with a significant post-treatment improvement in Favour of stretching group (mean difference, 6.57º; 95% confidence interval, 1.40º to 11.73º). Conclusion: there seems to be no difference between passive stretching and concentric external rotation exercise regarding improvements in glenohumeral range of motion in asymptomatic subjects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-30

How to Cite

Llarena-Quintanilla , F., Fernández-Matías , R., & Pecos-Martín , D. (2022). STRETCHING VERSUS CONCENTRIC EXERCISE FOR IMPROVING GLENOHUMERAL EXTERNAL ROTATION RANGE OF MOTION IN ASYMPTOMATIC SUBJECTS:A PILOT RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL. Cuestiones De Fisioterapia, 51(3), 201-211. http://cuestionesdefisioterapia.es/index.php/cf/article/view/45